In this Intel Core i5-11400H review, we’ll compare this mainstream CPU with its competitors the AMD Ryzen 5 5600H and the more powerful Ryzen 7 series. Both CPUs are similar in performance but the 11800H is six percent lower.
1. Intel Core i5-11400H Review
The 11400H performs better in every category except for graphics. For gaming, however, the 11400H is the better choice.
2. AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
The AMD Ryzen is a mid-range x86 mobile microprocessor that has been specifically designed for gaming laptops. This processor features six cores and twelve threads, with a maximum frequency of 4.2GHz. It supports DDR4-3200 or LPDDR4-4266 memory and supports AMD’s Radeon RX Vega 7 graphics. It has a TDP of 45 W.
The AMD Ryzen 5-5600H performed well in tests performed with Geekbench 5. It was able to achieve high scores in both benchmarks and was close to the group’s leaders. However, in real-world performance tests, the chip is inconsistent and underperforms its competitors. The user benchmark program is a freeware PC speed test, which allows you to compare the performance of a PC with another with similar components.
The AMD Ryzen five-series processor is based on AMD’s Zen 3 microarchitecture. It is part of the Cezanne family and is manufactured using TSMC’s 7nm FinFET lithography process. The processor has 64KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, with a total of 16 MB for shared L3 cache. The chip has a TDP of 45 W and utilizes DDR4 memory with a maximum data rate of 4266 MT/s.
In terms of gaming, the AMD Ryzen X5 5000 series Cezanne chips are significantly faster than the Ryzen 5 4600H. They feature a 200 MHz faster clock speed. This chip is faster than the Ryzen 5 4600H but is much more powerful than the Intel Core i7 10875H. It’s ideal for day-to-day tasks, as well as video editing and photo editing. It is also better at CAD applications.
When looking for a desktop processor, it is important to pay attention to the processor’s TDP, thread count, and turbo frequency. These three specs can make a difference in overall performance. A high-end CPU is more powerful, but it requires a good cooling system and a quality chipset to deliver its peak performance. Some manufacturers complement their CPUs with graphics chips, which are especially popular in notebooks. As you can see, the bigger the GPU, the better.
3. Intel Core i5-11400H
In our comparison, the Intel Core i5-11400H comes in at the lower end of the mainstream processor range, but it’s close to Ryzen 5600H and 5800H. It’s close to both of them, but the 11400H does outperform its rival in heavy multi-threading and has a higher power band. The AMD chip has a higher clock speed, but its cache is smaller, so it is slower in multi-threading.
Although the performance gap between the two chips is large, it’s still notable. While it’s far from the eight-core flagship model, the Core i5-11400H shows a huge leap over the 11800H. And while it can’t always beat the eight-core mannequin, it can certainly compete with it in some workloads, particularly those that benefit from the higher IPC and larger hoard of Tiger Lake.
The performance gap is quite small. Compared to the latest generation Core i9-10980HK, the Intel Core i5-11400H has little to show off in Cinebench R20. It’s also significantly slower than the AMD Ryzen 5 4600H and 5600H. It’s 8% slower than the 5600H and 19% slower than the 11800H. In the same way, its price is also lower.
The Intel Core i5-11400H is a six-core, twelve-thread processor with a blazing price tag of $182. Despite the low price, it’s a competitive performer, and AMD’s Ryzen 5 3600 is an old model. This chip still reigns unchallenged in the entry-level PC gaming market, but AMD’s Ryzen 5 3600 is two years old.
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 launched nearly two years ago, but the incredibly high demand has led to supply problems. Currently, it’s difficult to find one for an affordable price. AMD’s Zen 2 processors are limited, and it will be a while before it comes out with an answer for the Core i5-11400H. Alternatively, AMD may come out with a non-X version of its 5600X in the future.
The Intel Core i5-11400F is a better bargain than its predecessor, the i5-11600K. While you can’t overclock its cores, you can save a few bucks on the 11400H by sacrificing the built-in UHD Graphics. However, you should beware of the Core i5-11400H’s lack of E-cores on the silicon, but it is still a decent performer compared to other comparable CPUs.
While the 11400H is slow compared to other “Rocket Lake-S” CPUs, it is still a solid performer. While the 11400H does not outperform the other mainstream CPUs, it is better than the five600H, but it’s nowhere near the level of performance of AMD Ryzen. Its boosted frequencies are lower than the 5600H, but it can’t compete with the other AMD Ryzen CPUs.
The CPU-intensive title “Shadow of the Tomb Raider” was a good test for both. Both 12600K and 5600X outperformed the 5600X average frame rate, but both were slow in the lowest 1%. Overall performance was about the same in both games. This performance is in line with what you can expect for the price of a mid-range CPU, so a comparison of performance and cost should be able to answer any questions you may have.
As we mentioned earlier, the new Intel Core i5-11400H is designed for a low-cost market and is the first in the series to support DDR4-3200. The Gear 2 setting allows for double the memory’s frequency, which results in faster data transfer rates. However, the additional latency can decrease performance in specific applications, making this chip less useful for general computing.